The authorities not only do not want, but can not take anything from the rich. Unfortunately, now the trend is in power - to rely, first of all, on the rich. And the people, this is just choosing the electorate. So far, the people have not been given real levers to control the power and vital processes in the country.
Now the big Russian (and not only) officials are almost completely independent of the people they rule. They can be removed by someone from above, but they practically don’t practically answer to normal people for their own, even if they say, “controversial decisions”.
As a result, many appointed “top” officials perceive their appointment solely as an opportunity to get rich for the state.
This is at least wrong.
Therefore, it is necessary to oblige officials to report on their work at the end of their term of office before a special commission. This should not be similar to the report of our head of ministers to the State Duma, after which he continues to predominate without any consequences for himself, regardless of even the most fair criticism of even the most inadequate of his decisions.The required report of the official will be more like a trial with the prosecutor. Only a lawyer there can only be the outgoing official himself. Both the court and the official have the right to invite witnesses. According to the results of the trial, the jury commission takes a certain decision, in which it evaluates the work of the outgoing official more or less objectively. The commission must include, first of all, the subordinate departments of the departing official and those who depend on this department. So to say, it is necessary to create a subordinate COURT system. Members of the commission (court) are chosen by lot among all interested people. And then the court itself is selected from their composition. Remaining - become a jury. They take the verdict. The court approves it.
If necessary, the conclusions of this court can be transferred to the special services for administrative and criminal cases. And then they will be able to answer for all their unseemly deeds.
At the same time, the first question that the court is considering is a comparison of the financial situation of an official before and after the administration of his position. And on the basis of these data, the court’s decision on the transfer of the official’s case to the criminal court.
So officials who want to warm their hands in their posts can expect big trouble.
However, such a system of testing the efficiency of an official should be carried out at least annually. Yes, and before his appointment to the post, he must enlist the support of those whom he will send.
In principle, all changes, considering revolutions, almost always come from above.
But in this case, you can go from the bottom. For example, labor collectives through some of their associations, for example, trade unions themselves will begin to choose their own accountable chiefs and will force the management of enterprises to take into account their opinion. But are the lower classes ready to take responsibility? And you personally?
Maybe first with the help of trade unions. Although Shakovtsy may not help. So, we need a working self-organization. How did the Soviets arise in Russia? Self-organization. It's time to do it now.
Need explanatory work. A rolling stone gathers no moss. In tsarist times, too, not many workers immediately followed Lenin.
Need movement of people below. So that in labor collectives the question of the responsibility of the authorities and the option of achieving this goal through reporting to the subordinates was discussed. Alas! This process is not single-minded now.

Record Reactions

Statistics
Impressions: Coverage: Reads:
The authorities not only do not want, but can not take anything from the rich. Unfortunately, now the trend is in power - to rely, first of all, on the rich. And the people, this is just choosing the electorate. So far, the people have not been given real levers to control the power and vital processes in the country.
Now the big Russian (and not only) officials are almost completely independent of the people they rule. They can be removed by someone from above, but they practically don’t practically answer to normal people for their own, even if they say, “controversial decisions”.
As a result, many appointed “top” officials perceive their appointment solely as an opportunity to get rich for the state.
This is at least wrong.
Therefore, it is necessary to oblige officials to report on their work at the end of their term of office before a special commission. This should not be similar to the report of our head of ministers to the State Duma, after which he continues to predominate without any consequences for himself, regardless of even the most fair criticism of even the most inadequate of his decisions.The required report of the official will be more like a trial with the prosecutor. Only a lawyer there can only be the outgoing official himself. Both the court and the official have the right to invite witnesses. According to the results of the trial, the jury commission takes a certain decision, in which it evaluates the work of the outgoing official more or less objectively. The commission must include, first of all, the subordinate departments of the departing official and those who depend on this department. So to say, it is necessary to create a subordinate COURT system. Members of the commission (court) are chosen by lot among all interested people. And then the court itself is selected from their composition. Remaining - become a jury. They take the verdict. The court approves it.
If necessary, the conclusions of this court can be transferred to the special services for administrative and criminal cases. And then they will be able to answer for all their unseemly deeds.
At the same time, the first question that the court is considering is a comparison of the financial situation of an official before and after the administration of his position. And on the basis of these data, the court’s decision on the transfer of the official’s case to the criminal court.
So officials who want to warm their hands in their posts can expect big trouble.
However, such a system of testing the efficiency of an official should be carried out at least annually. Yes, and before his appointment to the post, he must enlist the support of those whom he will send.
In principle, all changes, considering revolutions, almost always come from above.
But in this case, you can go from the bottom. For example, labor collectives through some of their associations, for example, trade unions themselves will begin to choose their own accountable chiefs and will force the management of enterprises to take into account their opinion. But are the lower classes ready to take responsibility? And you personally?
Maybe first with the help of trade unions. Although Shakovtsy may not help. So, we need a working self-organization. How did the Soviets arise in Russia? Self-organization. It's time to do it now.
Need explanatory work. A rolling stone gathers no moss. In tsarist times, too, not many workers immediately followed Lenin.
Need movement of people below. So that in labor collectives the question of the responsibility of the authorities and the option of achieving this goal through reporting to the subordinates was discussed. Alas! This process is not single-minded now.

Record Reactions

Statistics
Impressions: Coverage: Reads:
The authorities not only do not want, but can not take anything from the rich. Unfortunately, now the trend is in power - to rely, first of all, on the rich. And the people, this is just choosing the electorate. So far, the people have not been given real levers to control the power and vital processes in the country.
Now the big Russian (and not only) officials are almost completely independent of the people they rule. They can be removed by someone from above, but they practically don’t practically answer to normal people for their own, even if they say, “controversial decisions”.
As a result, many appointed “top” officials perceive their appointment solely as an opportunity to get rich for the state.
This is at least wrong.
Therefore, it is necessary to oblige officials to report on their work at the end of their term of office before a special commission. This should not be similar to the report of our head of ministers to the State Duma, after which he continues to predominate without any consequences for himself, regardless of even the most fair criticism of even the most inadequate of his decisions.The required report of the official will be more like a trial with the prosecutor. Only a lawyer there can only be the outgoing official himself. Both the court and the official have the right to invite witnesses. According to the results of the trial, the jury commission takes a certain decision, in which it evaluates the work of the outgoing official more or less objectively. The commission must include, first of all, the subordinate departments of the departing official and those who depend on this department. So to say, it is necessary to create a subordinate COURT system. Members of the commission (court) are chosen by lot among all interested people. And then the court itself is selected from their composition. Remaining - become a jury. They take the verdict. The court approves it.
If necessary, the conclusions of this court can be transferred to the special services for administrative and criminal cases. And then they will be able to answer for all their unseemly deeds.
At the same time, the first question that the court is considering is a comparison of the financial situation of an official before and after the administration of his position. And on the basis of these data, the court’s decision on the transfer of the official’s case to the criminal court.
So officials who want to warm their hands in their posts can expect big trouble.
However, such a system of testing the efficiency of an official should be carried out at least annually. Yes, and before his appointment to the post, he must enlist the support of those whom he will send.
In principle, all changes, considering revolutions, almost always come from above.
But in this case, you can go from the bottom. For example, labor collectives through some of their associations, for example, trade unions themselves will begin to choose their own accountable chiefs and will force the management of enterprises to take into account their opinion. But are the lower classes ready to take responsibility? And you personally?
Maybe first with the help of trade unions. Although Shakovtsy may not help. So, we need a working self-organization. How did the Soviets arise in Russia? Self-organization. It's time to do it now.
Need explanatory work. A rolling stone gathers no moss. In tsarist times, too, not many workers immediately followed Lenin.
Need movement of people below. So that in labor collectives the question of the responsibility of the authorities and the option of achieving this goal through reporting to the subordinates was discussed. Alas! This process is not single-minded now.

Record Reactions

Statistics
Impressions: Coverage: Reads:
The authorities not only do not want, but can not take anything from the rich. Unfortunately, now the trend is in power - to rely, first of all, on the rich. And the people, this is just choosing the electorate. So far, the people have not been given real levers to control the power and vital processes in the country.
Now the big Russian (and not only) officials are almost completely independent of the people they rule. They can be removed by someone from above, but they practically don’t practically answer to normal people for their own, even if they say, “controversial decisions”.
As a result, many appointed “top” officials perceive their appointment solely as an opportunity to get rich for the state.
This is at least wrong.
Therefore, it is necessary to oblige officials to report on their work at the end of their term of office before a special commission. This should not be similar to the report of our head of ministers to the State Duma, after which he continues to predominate without any consequences for himself, regardless of even the most fair criticism of even the most inadequate of his decisions.The required report of the official will be more like a trial with the prosecutor. Only a lawyer there can only be the outgoing official himself. Both the court and the official have the right to invite witnesses. According to the results of the trial, the jury commission takes a certain decision, in which it evaluates the work of the outgoing official more or less objectively. The commission must include, first of all, the subordinate departments of the departing official and those who depend on this department. So to say, it is necessary to create a subordinate COURT system. Members of the commission (court) are chosen by lot among all interested people. And then the court itself is selected from their composition. Remaining - become a jury. They take the verdict. The court approves it.
If necessary, the conclusions of this court can be transferred to the special services for administrative and criminal cases. And then they will be able to answer for all their unseemly deeds.
At the same time, the first question that the court is considering is a comparison of the financial situation of an official before and after the administration of his position. And on the basis of these data, the court’s decision on the transfer of the official’s case to the criminal court.
So officials who want to warm their hands in their posts can expect big trouble.
However, such a system of testing the efficiency of an official should be carried out at least annually. Yes, and before his appointment to the post, he must enlist the support of those whom he will send.
In principle, all changes, considering revolutions, almost always come from above.
But in this case, you can go from the bottom. For example, labor collectives through some of their associations, for example, trade unions themselves will begin to choose their own accountable chiefs and will force the management of enterprises to take into account their opinion. But are the lower classes ready to take responsibility? And you personally?
Maybe first with the help of trade unions. Although Shakovtsy may not help. So, we need a working self-organization. How did the Soviets arise in Russia? Self-organization. It's time to do it now.
Need explanatory work. A rolling stone gathers no moss. In tsarist times, too, not many workers immediately followed Lenin.
Need movement of people below. So that in labor collectives the question of the responsibility of the authorities and the option of achieving this goal through reporting to the subordinates was discussed. Alas! This process is not single-minded now.

Record Reactions

Statistics
Impressions: Coverage: Reads:
The authorities not only do not want, but can not take anything from the rich. Unfortunately, now the trend is in power - to rely, first of all, on the rich. And the people, this is just choosing the electorate. So far, the people have not been given real levers to control the power and vital processes in the country.
Now the big Russian (and not only) officials are almost completely independent of the people they rule. They can be removed by someone from above, but they practically don’t practically answer to normal people for their own, even if they say, “controversial decisions”.
As a result, many appointed “top” officials perceive their appointment solely as an opportunity to get rich for the state.
This is at least wrong.
Therefore, it is necessary to oblige officials to report on their work at the end of their term of office before a special commission. This should not be similar to the report of our head of ministers to the State Duma, after which he continues to predominate without any consequences for himself, regardless of even the most fair criticism of even the most inadequate of his decisions.The required report of the official will be more like a trial with the prosecutor. Only a lawyer there can only be the outgoing official himself. Both the court and the official have the right to invite witnesses. According to the results of the trial, the jury commission takes a certain decision, in which it evaluates the work of the outgoing official more or less objectively. The commission must include, first of all, the subordinate departments of the departing official and those who depend on this department. So to say, it is necessary to create a subordinate COURT system. Members of the commission (court) are chosen by lot among all interested people. And then the court itself is selected from their composition. Remaining - become a jury. They take the verdict. The court approves it.
If necessary, the conclusions of this court can be transferred to the special services for administrative and criminal cases. And then they will be able to answer for all their unseemly deeds.
At the same time, the first question that the court is considering is a comparison of the financial situation of an official before and after the administration of his position. And on the basis of these data, the court’s decision on the transfer of the official’s case to the criminal court.
So officials who want to warm their hands in their posts can expect big trouble.
However, such a system of testing the efficiency of an official should be carried out at least annually. Yes, and before his appointment to the post, he must enlist the support of those whom he will send.
In principle, all changes, considering revolutions, almost always come from above.
But in this case, you can go from the bottom. For example, labor collectives through some of their associations, for example, trade unions themselves will begin to choose their own accountable chiefs and will force the management of enterprises to take into account their opinion. But are the lower classes ready to take responsibility? And you personally?
Maybe first with the help of trade unions. Although Shakovtsy may not help. So, we need a working self-organization. How did the Soviets arise in Russia? Self-organization. It's time to do it now.
Need explanatory work. A rolling stone gathers no moss. In tsarist times, too, not many workers immediately followed Lenin.
Need movement of people below. So that in labor collectives the question of the responsibility of the authorities and the option of achieving this goal through reporting to the subordinates was discussed. Alas! This process is not single-minded now.

Related news

Unfortunately, that image, picture, imagery


Unfortunately, that 75


Unfortunately, that 44


Unfortunately, that 65


Unfortunately, that 20


Unfortunately, that 78


Unfortunately, that 60