Is gay marriage a perversion or a free choice?
In our minds, the stereotypehappy family. We firmly believe that a successful marriage is a guarantee of harmony, prosperity, realization in life. But is it really so? How many examples is there that a person either can not find a soul mate at all, or in his personal and family lifelife there are constant "earthquakes". And sometimes it happens that marriage is a cover, just a glossy cover for a completely different relationship. So is the game worth the candle? Is it necessary to always strive to be like everyone else? After all, it is often because of this aspiration that hasty alliances are made, people enter into destructive relationships, making not only themselves, but also children unhappy. How to lead the family upbringing of the younger generation? So, as it is customary from time immemorial (since the days of Domostroi) in Orthodox Russia? Or as it is in America or Europe? It's no secret that many countries have already legalized (and others are ready to make it legal)same-sex marriage: this is evidence of time, and proof of a shift in public consciousness.
We will not shy away from "perverts" andcondemn the fall of morals. In modern European and American schools, gender education is carried out on the principle of maximum tolerance. The fact that same-sex unions appeared not now and not yesterday, it is not worth proving. But one thing is a tacit connection, and another is marriage. This is an economic, emotional and physical union of two people. And who said that if they are of the same sex, then all these types of relationships are not for them? Homosexual couples very often not only live together and lead a common household, but also connects their sincere affection, tested by long years. And if marriage is a legal relationship between two people, of which their mutual rights and obligations (including property rights) follow, then why should not this be allowed for same-sexunions?
Very often opponents of such families motivate thisthat they can not conceive and bring up children. However let's get into the essence of the problem. Yes, such pairs can not conceive naturally. But how many "natural" couples resort to artificial insemination or adoption? And how many "natural" families disintegrate? How many of them have deep psychological problems, dramas, violence ...? Same-sex marriages are much more often completely consciously, in adulthood, after a long search for oneself. Such couples often not only can, but also very much want to raise children. And if there is harmony and mutual understanding between them, will the child be worse with two dads or mothers than one or in an incomplete family?Another point is also interesting and worthy of attention. If, for example, a fictitious marriage is an alliance that is concluded for the purpose of property or non-property benefit, in which one or all of the "normal" family is missing, this is not found among same-sex couples. Perhaps the point is in the relative novelty of the phenomenon, perhaps in the fact that it is still considered a certain deviation. But it is in such families that violence and pressure are much less common. And if a fictitious marriage is (a definition of the phenomenon can not be unambiguous) often a concession to public pressure or circumstances, then unions of people of the same sex are concluded only on their own will. So let's not hurry up with condemnation and censure. To assess the phenomenon, years of observation, analysis and weighted conclusions are necessary. In principle, everyone builds his life as he sees fit. It's only his life.